<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Zeitgeist &#187; lawyers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeitgeist.com/tag/lawyers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeitgeist.com</link>
	<description>Technology. Opinion. Stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:12:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Time for an IP/Trademark Penalty Box?</title>
		<link>http://www.zeitgeist.com/2010/02/13/time-for-an-iptrademark-penalty-box/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zeitgeist.com/2010/02/13/time-for-an-iptrademark-penalty-box/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 21:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David HM Spector</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Startups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeitgeist.com/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iiiinteresting.  Twitter seems to, despite previous assurances from co-founder Biz Stone that it wouldn&#8217;t,  be going after app developers using &#8220;Tweet&#8221; as part of their app names.
Now, if Twitter actually had a trademark on the term &#8220;tweet&#8221; it would be one thing, but to be sending takedown notices for something you don&#8217;t own [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zeitgeist.com/2010/02/13/time-for-an-iptrademark-penalty-box/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
