 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NYT Devalues Itself. Again. &#8230; Allows commenter(s) to smear Al Gore on Page 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeitgeist.com/2007/10/12/nyt-devalues-itself-again-allows-commenter-to-smear-al-gore-on-page-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeitgeist.com/2007/10/12/nyt-devalues-itself-again-allows-commenter-to-smear-al-gore-on-page-1/</link>
	<description>Technology. Opinion. Stuff.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: In Anchor &#187; Should Comments Be Part of the News?</title>
		<link>http://www.zeitgeist.com/2007/10/12/nyt-devalues-itself-again-allows-commenter-to-smear-al-gore-on-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>In Anchor &#187; Should Comments Be Part of the News?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 06:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeitgeist.com/2007/10/12/nyt-devalues-itself-again-allows-commenter-to-smear-al-gore-on-page-1/#comment-206</guid>
		<description>[...] says the Times should be congratulated for this experiment in social media, while David Spector says that it&#8217;s a terrible idea and that the newspaper is &#8220;devaluing&#8221; itself by doing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] says the Times should be congratulated for this experiment in social media, while David Spector says that it&rsquo;s a terrible idea and that the newspaper is &ldquo;devaluing&rdquo; itself by doing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should comments be part of the news? - mathewingram.com/media</title>
		<link>http://www.zeitgeist.com/2007/10/12/nyt-devalues-itself-again-allows-commenter-to-smear-al-gore-on-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Should comments be part of the news? - mathewingram.com/media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 04:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeitgeist.com/2007/10/12/nyt-devalues-itself-again-allows-commenter-to-smear-al-gore-on-page-1/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>[...] says the Times should be congratulated for this experiment in social media, while David Spector says that it&#8217;s a terrible idea and that the newspaper is &#8220;devaluing&#8221; itself by doing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] says the Times should be congratulated for this experiment in social media, while David Spector says that it&#8217;s a terrible idea and that the newspaper is &#8220;devaluing&#8221; itself by doing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should comments be part of the news? - - mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.zeitgeist.com/2007/10/12/nyt-devalues-itself-again-allows-commenter-to-smear-al-gore-on-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Should comments be part of the news? - - mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 04:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeitgeist.com/2007/10/12/nyt-devalues-itself-again-allows-commenter-to-smear-al-gore-on-page-1/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>[...] says the Times should be congratulated for this experiment in social media, while David Spector says that it&#8217;s a terrible idea and that the newspaper is &#8220;devaluing&#8221; itself by doing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] says the Times should be congratulated for this experiment in social media, while David Spector says that it&#8217;s a terrible idea and that the newspaper is &#8220;devaluing&#8221; itself by doing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comments on the NY Times Front Page? &#171; The Knight News Challenge Information Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.zeitgeist.com/2007/10/12/nyt-devalues-itself-again-allows-commenter-to-smear-al-gore-on-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Comments on the NY Times Front Page? &#171; The Knight News Challenge Information Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeitgeist.com/2007/10/12/nyt-devalues-itself-again-allows-commenter-to-smear-al-gore-on-page-1/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>[...] Many are lauding the Times for being progressive and opening the conversation between readers and journalists (and it is true that sometimes citizen journalism is the best coverage, because it comes from people who are actually on the scene or witnessed the event), but this move has also garnered some criticism. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Many are lauding the Times for being progressive and opening the conversation between readers and journalists (and it is true that sometimes citizen journalism is the best coverage, because it comes from people who are actually on the scene or witnessed the event), but this move has also garnered some criticism. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: you - now featured on the nytimes – by [muhammad.saleem]</title>
		<link>http://www.zeitgeist.com/2007/10/12/nyt-devalues-itself-again-allows-commenter-to-smear-al-gore-on-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>you - now featured on the nytimes – by [muhammad.saleem]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 23:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeitgeist.com/2007/10/12/nyt-devalues-itself-again-allows-commenter-to-smear-al-gore-on-page-1/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>[...] is happy with the move. david spector, for example, thinks that this is another step towards devaluing the nytimes. so, suddenly the ny times decides its a good idea to put comments from random readers on its front [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is happy with the move. david spector, for example, thinks that this is another step towards devaluing the nytimes. so, suddenly the ny times decides its a good idea to put comments from random readers on its front [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Usersky Daily News Network &#187; New York Times Puts Reader Comments on Main Page - Good Idea?</title>
		<link>http://www.zeitgeist.com/2007/10/12/nyt-devalues-itself-again-allows-commenter-to-smear-al-gore-on-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Usersky Daily News Network &#187; New York Times Puts Reader Comments on Main Page - Good Idea?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 23:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeitgeist.com/2007/10/12/nyt-devalues-itself-again-allows-commenter-to-smear-al-gore-on-page-1/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>[...] writing, &#8220;Hats off to the company&#8217;s web team for this smart move!&#8221; Other bloggers weren&#8217;t so upbeat. While it seems that the NYT times took pains to make sure that comments from both ends of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] writing, &#8220;Hats off to the company&#8217;s web team for this smart move!&#8221; Other bloggers weren&#8217;t so upbeat. While it seems that the NYT times took pains to make sure that comments from both ends of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
